What Kind of Representation?: Part II


Over the past few years, the way in which I use Facebook has changed drastically. I no longer use it as a way to keep in touch with friends, post pictures, or anything like that. Instead, it’s part of the way I get my news. I follow several news and cultural websites and spend quite a bit of time digesting the articles every day. This week, my Facebook newsfeed was covered in articles about the new music biopic Nina. The film is supposed to tell the story of Nina Simone, the famed jazz musician and civil rights activist featured in the picture to the left below. All the articles I read expressed intense dissatisfaction with the actress chosen to portray Simone — Zoe Saldana, featured in the picture to the right below.

I heard this issue a while ago, but the trailer just came out this week. Previously, I wasn’t sure how the film was going to handle the obvious difference in their skin tones. Were they just going to have Saldana play Simone as a light-skinned woman and completely erase a big part of who she was, of what she fought for? Or were they going to darken Saldana’s skin? (I don’t even know which one is worse). Well, the trailer answered the question for me: they darkened her skin. And it looks absolutely ridiculous. It’s so distracting and makes me so angry. I can’t even.


Unfortunately, this isn’t surprising. There are so many issues with racism and colorism in Hollywood. And it goes way beyond #OscarsSoWhite. Hollywood is obsessed with whiteness and lightness, and it has been for a long time. Think about Elizabeth Taylor as Cleopatra, Laurence Oliver as Othello, Natalie Wood as Maria in West Side Story, John Wayne as Ghenghis Khan, Johnny Depp as Tonto, and the list goes on and on. It’s not just Hollywood either; indeed, the same effect is seen in India’s Bollywood.

All of this takes me back to the question I posed in my blog post last week: what kind of representation is acceptable? I think it is fantastic that someone wanted to tell Simone’s story. She was a remarkable, talented, and powerful woman; she deserves to be recognized and remembered in this way. But it is offensive to her name to cast someone who does not resemble her at all (and her family agrees); choosing Saldana takes away an important part of Simone’s life experience — of who she was. While it’s not as bad as blackface, it still reeks of the same thing. It’s Hollywood’s way of pretending it’s not racist because, you know, they’re still casting a Black woman in the role. But it’s like a backhanded compliment because it still feels like they don’t think darker-skinned women are good enough. This is not acceptable representation.

I think darker-skinned women are best suited to play dark-skinned women. And there are so many talented dark-skinned actresses who could have portrayed Simone. One of the things I kept hearing in the #OscarsSoWhite discussion was that many artists of color were frustrated because they felt that there were not many roles written for them. This could have been one. It is so sad and frustrating when POC continue to be overlooked and cannot even play historical figures that look like them. This is not acceptable representation.

Finally, I’m really disappointed in Zoe Saldana. I’ve seen some of her movies, and she is definitely talented. But she should have known better. I think back to my first post this semester when I talked about how light-skinned individuals need to check their privilege and make sure they leave space for their darker-skinned counterparts. Zoe has not done that at all. In fact, her response to the controversy is horrifying:

“I didn’t think I was right for the part, and I know a lot people will agree, but then again, I don’t think Elizabeth Taylor was right for Cleopatra either. An artist is colorless, genderless … It’s more complex than just, ‘Oh, you chose the Halle Berry look-alike to play a dark, strikingly beautiful, iconic black woman.’ The truth is, they chose an artist who was willing to sacrifice herself. We needed to tell her story because she deserves it.” –Zoe Saldana

Just because something was done in the past doesn’t mean it should continue to be perpetuated when it’s wrong. The status quo isn’t great, and if we continue to believe that artists are colorless and genderless, we will continue to allow only a few types of artist to have all the roles, excluding other amazing talent. This is not acceptable representation. The truth is, they chose an artist who would sell because … racism. It has nothing to do with sacrifice. It has everything to do with power and privilege.

P.S. If  you want to learn about Nina Simone, check out the documentary What Happened, Miss Simone on Netflix. In the process of writing this blog post, I finally started it (it had been in my queue for a while) and it’s great! It uses real footage of Simone herself and includes interviews with her family.


3 thoughts on “What Kind of Representation?: Part II

  1. Thank you!!! I was going to write my blog this week on this as well and last minute changed my mind but I’m so happy that this story is being told! I brought this to the Black Caucus meeting last week because I was curious as to the thoughts from people in the Black community on this. Many agreed that this was extremely problematic but others didn’t see the problem.

    I find it extremely problematic and also am frustrated with Saldana’s response. It shows her privilege and ignorance but it also shows how Hollywood has an impact on us. I feel that she may feel that she needs to be defensive because she has to be so protective of a role for Black women and also her worth as a Black artist. If (a variety of) Black actresses and actors were valued and represented, this wouldn’t even need to be a discussion but roles and opportunities are so limited, I can imagine why she would be so protective- especially if she feels she did a good job with the role.


  2. I’ve seen stories about this Nina Simone movie and Zoe Saldana playing this role on my Facebook timeline this week as well. As you mention, this is a complicated issue all around and Saldana is both responsible for not turning down the part that she even admits she “wasn’t right for” but also a victim of racism in Hollywood. However, this is the first time I am seeing her quote/explanation. Her response makes her sound like she actually didn’t care about representing Nina Simone and honoring black culture. It sounds like she wanted to make sure she got paid and would do anything to make that happen. This is unfortunate and sad and behavior like this is just going to keep oppressing black actors.

    I wonder if any other actors were considered for this role or if Zoe Saldana was their first choice?


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s